Family Website Services

FamilyLobby.com Review: Outdated Technology Meets Family Networking

By Family Technology Team
Critical analysis of FamilyLobby.com family website platform, highlighting significant technology limitations, poor mobile support, and outdated features that impact user experience.

Overview of FamilyLobby.com

FamilyLobby.com represents what happens when family website services fail to evolve with modern technology standards. Built on Microsoft's Classic ASP technology—a framework Microsoft abandoned around 2000—this platform serves as a cautionary tale about the importance of technological modernization in family communication tools.

Our comprehensive review reveals significant limitations that make FamilyLobby.com difficult to recommend for contemporary family use. From security concerns with ActiveX controls to Flash-based features that don't work on mobile devices, this platform's outdated approach creates barriers rather than bridges for family communication.

Critical Technology Assessment

Outdated Development Framework

Classic ASP Technology Concerns:

  • Built on Microsoft Classic ASP, abandoned by Microsoft circa 2000
  • Over two decades behind current web development standards
  • Security vulnerabilities inherent in legacy technology
  • Limited scalability and performance compared to modern frameworks
  • Lack of modern browser compatibility features

Impact on User Experience:

  • Slower loading times and poor performance
  • Limited functionality compared to modern platforms
  • Increased security risks for family data
  • Poor integration with contemporary web services
  • Minimal mobile device support

Interface and Design Analysis

Visual Presentation:

  • Website design reminiscent of late 1990s web development
  • Cluttered layouts with poor user experience design
  • Limited responsive design for modern devices
  • Dated color schemes and typography choices
  • Navigation patterns that confuse modern users

Feature Analysis and Limitations

Photo Management System

Multi-Photo Upload Issues:

  • No browser-based multi-photo upload capability
  • Relies on ActiveX-based upload tool requiring local installation
  • Security Risk: ActiveX controls are widely considered unsafe by modern security standards
  • Most modern browsers block or warn against ActiveX installations
  • Significantly hampers the primary use case of family photo sharing

Photo Organization:

  • Basic folder structure available
  • Limited editing or enhancement capabilities
  • Poor integration with modern photo formats
  • Slow upload processing times

Activity Tracking and Communication

"What's New" Limitations:

  • Basic activity feed called "What's New" section
  • Missing critical activity types: Comments and other minor interactions not included
  • Difficult for family members to track recent site activity
  • No notification system for important updates
  • Limited engagement tracking capabilities

Guest Book Feature Assessment

Redundant Functionality:

  • Traditional "Guest Book" feature provides minimal value
  • Limited to short text entries (couple of paragraphs)
  • Redundant with discussions section already available
  • Adds unnecessary complexity without additional functionality
  • Takes up valuable interface space

Family Tree Functionality

Flash-Based Limitations:

  • Critical Mobile Limitation: Flash-based family tree won't work on mobile devices or most tablets
  • Flash technology deprecated by major browsers
  • No GEDCOM Support: Missing import/export functionality for GEDCOM files
  • GEDCOM support is essential for serious genealogy work
  • Limited integration with other family history tools

Video Upload and Management

Video Format Restrictions:

  • Successfully handles MP4 files (browser-compatible format)
  • AVI Upload Failures: Returns "Failed. Invalid file. Error - File not found" messages
  • No automatic video conversion capabilities
  • Most families expect to upload videos directly from phones/cameras
  • Potential Show-Stopper: Video sharing limitations may eliminate platform viability

Technical Performance Issues

Upload System Problems:

  • Flash-based upload controls frequently hang during operation
  • Tested with latest Firefox version showing persistent failures
  • Outdated Technology: Still using Flash instead of modern AJAX solutions
  • AJAX file upload solutions have been standard for over a decade
  • Poor reliability affects core functionality

Security and Compatibility Concerns

ActiveX Security Risks

Major Security Issues:

  • Requires ActiveX control installation for photo uploads
  • ActiveX technology considered unsafe by security experts
  • Modern browsers actively block or warn against ActiveX
  • Creates potential security vulnerabilities for family data
  • May expose family computers to malware risks

Browser and Device Compatibility

Limited Modern Support:

  • Flash dependencies prevent mobile device usage
  • Poor performance on contemporary browsers
  • Limited tablet functionality
  • No responsive design for various screen sizes
  • Incompatible with modern web standards

Comparison with Modern Alternatives

Technology Stack Comparison

FamilyLobby.com vs. Modern Platforms:

| Aspect | FamilyLobby | Modern Alternatives | |--------|-------------|-------------------| | Development Framework | Classic ASP (2000) | Modern MVC, PHP, React | | Mobile Support | Flash-based (broken) | Responsive, native apps | | Upload Technology | ActiveX (unsafe) | Secure AJAX/HTML5 | | File Support | Limited formats | Universal format support | | Security | Legacy vulnerabilities | Modern encryption/security |

Feature Set Comparison

While FamilyLobby offers a "decent amount of features and configurability," these features are implemented using outdated technology that creates more problems than solutions. Modern alternatives provide:

  • Secure, browser-based file uploads
  • Full mobile device compatibility
  • Modern video format support with automatic conversion
  • GEDCOM import/export for serious genealogy work
  • Real-time activity feeds and notifications
  • Enhanced security and privacy controls

Recommendations and Alternatives

Who Should Avoid FamilyLobby

Platform Not Recommended For:

  • Families using mobile devices (majority of users)
  • Users concerned about security and privacy
  • Families wanting to share videos regularly
  • Genealogy enthusiasts needing GEDCOM support
  • Users expecting modern web application performance

Better Alternative Categories

Modern Family Website Services:

  • Cloud-based platforms with mobile apps
  • Services supporting all major video formats
  • Platforms with GEDCOM import/export
  • Solutions with modern security implementations
  • Services offering responsive design

Specialized Alternatives:

  • Dedicated genealogy platforms for family tree building
  • Modern photo sharing services with family privacy
  • Video sharing platforms with family-specific features
  • Comprehensive family communication tools

Final Verdict and Rating

Overall Assessment: 1.5/5 Stars

FamilyLobby.com serves as an example of what happens when family technology platforms fail to evolve. The single word that best describes this service is indeed "outdated," as identified in our review. The combination of:

  • Obsolete technology stack (Classic ASP from 2000)
  • Security risks with ActiveX requirements
  • Flash-based features unusable on mobile devices
  • Poor video format support
  • Unreliable upload systems
  • Dated user interface design

Creates a platform that actively hinders rather than helps family communication and sharing.

Why This Matters for Families

Modern families expect:

  • Mobile-first experiences for on-the-go sharing
  • Secure platforms protecting family privacy
  • Easy media sharing without technical barriers
  • Reliable performance for important family moments
  • Contemporary interfaces that family members can navigate intuitively

FamilyLobby.com fails to deliver on these fundamental expectations.

Conclusion and Recommendations

While FamilyLobby.com may have been competitive in the early 2000s, its failure to modernize technology and user experience makes it unsuitable for contemporary family communication needs. The platform's reliance on deprecated technologies creates security risks and usability barriers that modern families shouldn't have to navigate.

Strong Recommendation: Explore modern family website alternatives that provide:

  • Mobile-responsive design and native apps
  • Secure, modern file upload capabilities
  • Full video format support with automatic conversion
  • GEDCOM import/export for genealogy enthusiasts
  • Real-time activity feeds and notifications
  • Contemporary user interfaces and experience design

The family website service landscape offers numerous superior alternatives that provide the connectivity and sharing capabilities families need without the technological limitations and security concerns presented by outdated platforms like FamilyLobby.com.

This review is part of our comprehensive family website service analysis series. Check our other reviews to find modern, secure, and feature-rich platforms that better serve today's family communication needs.

Tags

FamilyLobbyfamily websiteswebsite reviewsoutdated technologyfamily networkingClassic ASPfamily treephoto sharing
FTT

Family Technology Team

7 minute read

Published

January 15, 2024

Ready to Start Planning Your Family Reunion?

Join Famlu today and create lasting memories with your family.

Get Started